blog/_posts/Mathematics/measure-theory/2023-07-31-Lp-functions.md

share, toc, math, categories, path, tags, title, date, github_title, image, attachment

share	toc	math	categories	path	tags	title	date	github_title	image	attachment
true	true	true	Mathematics Measure Theory	_posts/mathematics/measure-theory	math analysis measure-theory	09. $\mathcal{L}^p$ Functions	2023-07-31	2023-07-31-Lp-functions	path /assets/img/posts/mathematics/measure-theory/mt-09.png	folder assets/img/posts/mathematics/measure-theory

{: .w-50}

Integration on Complex Valued Function

Let (X, \mathscr{F}, \mu) be a measure space, and E \in \mathscr{F}.

정의.

1. A complex valued function f = u + iv, (where u, v are real functions) is measurable if u and v are both measurable.

2. For a complex function f,

   \in \mathcal{L}^{1}(E, \mu) \iff \int _ E \left\lvert f \right\rvert \,d{\mu} < \infty \iff u, v \in \mathcal{L}^{1}(E, \mu).$

3. If f = u + iv \in \mathcal{L}^{1}(E, \mu), we define

   int _ E f \,d{\mu} = \int _ E u \,d{\mu} + i\int _ E v \,d{\mu}.$

참고.

1. Linearity also holds for complex valued functions. For f _ 1, f _ 2 \in \mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu) and \alpha \in \mathbb{C},

   int _ E \left( f _ 1 + \alpha f _ 2 \right) \,d{\mu} = \int _ E f _ 1 \,d{\mu} + \alpha \int _ E f _ 2 \,d{\mu}.$

2. Choose c \in \mathbb{C} and \left\lvert c \right\rvert = 1 such that \displaystyle c \int _ E f \,d{\mu} \geq 0. This is possible since multiplying by c is equivalent to a rotation.

Now set cf = u + vi where u, v are real functions and the integral of v over E is 0. Then,

\begin{aligned} \left\lvert \int _ E f \,d{\mu} \right\rvert & = c \int _ E f\,d{\mu} = \int _ E u \,d{\mu} \\ & \leq \int _ E (u^2+v^2)^{1/2} \,d{\mu} \\ & = \int _ E \left\lvert cf \right\rvert \,d{\mu} = \int _ E \left\lvert f \right\rvert \,d{\mu}. \end{aligned}

Functions of Class \mathcal{L}^{p}

\mathcal{L}^p Space

Assume that (X, \mathscr{F}, \mu) is given and X = E.

정의. (\mathcal{L}^{p}) A complex function f is in \mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu) if f is measurable and \displaystyle\int _ E \left\lvert f \right\rvert ^p \,d{\mu} < \infty.

정의. ($\mathcal{L}^{p}$-norm) $\mathcal{L}^{p}$-norm of f is defined as

\left\lVert f \right\rVert _ p = \left[\int _ E \left\lvert f \right\rvert ^p \,d{\mu} \right]^{1/p}.

Inequalities

정리. (Young Inequality) For a, b \geq 0, if p > 1 and 1/p + 1/q = 1, then

ab \leq \frac{a^p}{p} + \frac{b^q}{q}.

증명. From 1/p + 1/q = 1, p - 1 = \frac{1}{q - 1}. The graph y = x^{p - 1} is equal to the graph of x = y^{q - 1}. Sketch the graph on the $xy$-plane and consider the area bounded by x = 0, x = a, y = 0, y = b. Then we directly see that

\int _ 0^a x^{p-1} \,d{x} + \int _ 0^b y^{q-1} \,d{y} \geq ab,

with equality when a^p = b^q. Evaluating the integral gives the desired inequality.

참고. For $\mathscr{F}$-measurable f, g on X,

\left\lvert fg \right\rvert \leq \frac{\left\lvert f \right\rvert ^p}{p} + \frac{\left\lvert g \right\rvert ^q}{q} \implies \left\lVert fg \right\rVert _ 1 \leq \frac{\left\lVert f \right\rVert _ p^p}{p} + \frac{\left\lVert g \right\rVert _ q^q}{q}

by Young inequality. In particular, if \left\lVert f \right\rVert _ p = \left\lVert g \right\rVert _ q = 1, then \left\lVert fg \right\rVert _ 1 \leq 1.

정리. (Hölder Inequality) Let 1 < p < \infty and \displaystyle\frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = 1. If f, g are measurable,

\left\lVert fg \right\rVert _ 1 \leq \left\lVert f \right\rVert _ p \left\lVert g \right\rVert _ q.

So if f \in \mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu) and g \in \mathcal{L}^{q}(\mu), then fg \in \mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu).

증명. If \left\lVert f \right\rVert _ p = 0 or \left\lVert g \right\rVert _ q = 0 then f = 0 a.e. or g = 0 a.e. So fg = 0 a.e. and \left\lVert fg \right\rVert _ 1 = 0.

Now suppose that \left\lVert f \right\rVert _ p > 0 and \left\lVert g \right\rVert _ q > 0. By the remark above, the result directly follows from

\left\lVert \frac{f}{\left\lVert f \right\rVert _ p} \cdot \frac{g}{\left\lVert g \right\rVert _ q} \right\rVert _ 1 \leq 1.

정리. (Minkowski Inequality) For 1 \leq p < \infty, if f, g are measurable, then

\left\lVert f + g \right\rVert _ p \leq \left\lVert f \right\rVert _ p + \left\lVert g \right\rVert _ p.

증명. If f, g \notin \mathcal{L}^{p}, the right hand side is \infty and we are done. For p = 1, the equality is equivalent to the triangle inequality. Also if \left\lVert f + g \right\rVert _ p = 0, the inequality holds trivially. We suppose that p > 1, f, g \in \mathcal{L}^p and \left\lVert f+g \right\rVert _ p > 0.

Let q = \frac{p}{p-1}. Since

\begin{aligned} \left\lvert f + g \right\rvert ^p & = \left\lvert f + g \right\rvert \cdot \left\lvert f + g \right\rvert ^{p - 1} \\ & \leq \bigl(\left\lvert f \right\rvert + \left\lvert g \right\rvert \bigr) \left\lvert f + g \right\rvert ^{p-1}, \end{aligned}

we have

\begin{aligned} \int \left\lvert f+g \right\rvert ^p & \leq \int \left\lvert f \right\rvert \cdot \left\lvert f+g \right\rvert ^{p-1} + \int \left\lvert g \right\rvert \cdot \left\lvert f+g \right\rvert ^{p-1} \\ & \leq \left( \int \left\lvert f \right\rvert ^p \right)^{1/p}\left( \int \left\lvert f+g \right\rvert ^{(p-1)q} \right)^{1/q} \\ & \quad + \left( \int \left\lvert q \right\rvert ^p \right)^{1/p}\left( \int \left\lvert f+g \right\rvert ^{(p-1)q} \right)^{1/q} \\ & = \left( \left\lVert f \right\rVert _ p + \left\lVert g \right\rVert _ p \right) \left( \int \left\lvert f+g \right\rvert ^p \right)^{1/q}. \end{aligned}

Since \left\lVert f + g \right\rVert _ p^p > 0, we have

\begin{aligned} \left\lVert f + g \right\rVert _ p & = \left( \int \left\lvert f+g \right\rvert ^p \right)^{1/p} \\ & = \left( \int \left\lvert f+g \right\rvert ^p \right)^{1 - \frac{1}{q}} \\ & \leq \left\lVert f \right\rVert _ p + \left\lVert g \right\rVert _ p. \end{aligned}

정의. f \sim g \iff f = g $\mu$-a.e. and define

[f] = \left\lbrace g : f \sim g\right\rbrace.

We treat [f] as an element in \mathcal{L}^{p}(X, \mu), and write f = [f].

참고.

1. We write \left\lVert f \right\rVert _ p = 0 \iff f = [0] = 0 in the sense that f = 0 $\mu$-a.e.

2. Now \lVert \cdot \rVert _ p is a norm in \mathcal{L}^{p}(X, \mu) so d(f, g) = \left\lVert f - g \right\rVert _ p is a metric in \mathcal{L}^{p}(X, \mu).

Completeness of \mathcal{L}^p

Now we have a function space, so we are interested in its completeness.

정의. (Convergence in \mathcal{L}^p) Let f, f _ n \in \mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu).

1. f _ n \rightarrow f in \mathcal{L}^p(\mu) \iff \left\lVert f _ n-f \right\rVert _ p \rightarrow 0 as n \rightarrow\infty.

2. \left( f _ n \right) _ {n=1}^\infty is a Cauchy sequence in \mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu) if and only if

\forall \epsilon > 0, \exists\,N > 0 such that n, m \geq N \implies \left\lVert f _ n-f _ m \right\rVert _ p < \epsilon.

도움정리. Let \left( g _ n \right) be a sequence of measurable functions. Then,

\left\lVert \sum _ {n=1}^{\infty} \left\lvert g _ n \right\rvert \right\rVert _ p \leq \sum _ {n=1}^{\infty} \left\lVert g _ n \right\rVert _ p.

Thus, if \displaystyle\sum _ {n=1}^{\infty} \left\lVert g _ n \right\rVert _ p < \infty, then \displaystyle\sum _ {n=1}^{\infty} \left\lvert g _ n \right\rvert < \infty $\mu$-a.e. So \displaystyle\sum _ {n=1}^{\infty} g _ n < \infty $\mu$-a.e.

증명. By monotone convergence theorem and Minkowski inequality,

\begin{aligned} \left\lVert \sum _ {n=1}^{\infty} \left\lvert g _ n \right\rvert \right\rVert _ p & = \lim _ {m \rightarrow\infty} \left\lVert \sum _ {n=1}^{m} \left\lvert g _ n \right\rvert \right\rVert _ p \\ & \leq \lim _ {n \rightarrow\infty} \sum _ {n=1}^{m} \left\lVert g _ n \right\rVert _ p \\ & = \sum _ {n=1}^{\infty} \left\lVert g _ n \right\rVert _ p < \infty. \end{aligned}

Thus \displaystyle\sum _ {n=1}^{\infty} \left\lvert g _ n \right\rvert < \infty $\mu$-a.e. and \displaystyle\sum _ {n=1}^{\infty} g _ n < \infty $\mu$-a.e. by absolute convergence.

정리. (Fischer) Suppose \left( f _ n \right) is a Cauchy sequence in \mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu). Then there exists f \in \mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu) such that f _ n \rightarrow f in \mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu).

증명. We construct \left( n _ k \right) by the following procedure.

\exists\,n _ 1 \in \mathbb{N} such that \left\lVert f _ m - f _ {n _ 1} \right\rVert _ p < \frac{1}{2} for all m \geq n _ 1.

\exists\,n _ 2 \in \mathbb{N} such that \left\lVert f _ m - f _ {n _ 2} \right\rVert _ p < \frac{1}{2^2} for all m \geq n _ 2.

Then, \exists\,1 \leq n _ 1 < n _ 2 < \cdots < n _ k such that \left\lVert f _ m - f _ {n _ k} \right\rVert _ p < \frac{1}{2^k} for m \geq n _ k.

Since \displaystyle\left\lVert f _ {n _ {k+1}} - f _ {n _ k} \right\rVert _ p < \frac{1}{2^k}, we have

\sum _ {k=1}^{\infty} \left\lVert f _ {n _ {k+1}} - f _ {n _ k} \right\rVert _ p < \infty.

By the above lemma, \sum \left\lvert f _ {n _ {k+1}} - f _ {n _ k} \right\rvert and \sum (f _ {n _ {k+1}} - f _ {n _ k}) are finite. Let f _ {n _ 0} \equiv 0. Then as m \rightarrow\infty,

f _ {n _ {m+1}} = \sum _ {k=0}^{m} \left( f _ {n _ {k+1}} - f _ {n _ k} \right)

converges $\mu$-a.e. Take N \in \mathscr{F} with \mu(N) = 0 such that f _ {n _ k} converges on X \setminus N. Let

f(x) = \begin{cases} \displaystyle\lim _ {k \rightarrow\infty} f _ {n _ k} (x) & (x \in X \setminus N) \\ 0 & (x\in N) \end{cases}

then f is measurable. Using the convergence,

\begin{aligned} \left\lVert f - f _ {n _ m} \right\rVert _ p & = \left\lVert \sum _ {k=m}^{\infty} \left( f _ {n _ {k+1}} (x) - f _ {n _ k}(x) \right) \right\rVert _ p \\ & \leq \left\lVert \sum _ {k=m}^{\infty} \left\lvert f _ {n _ {k+1}} (x) - f _ {n _ k}(x) \right\rvert \right\rVert _ p \\ & \leq \sum _ {k=m}^{\infty} \left\lVert f _ {n _ {k+1}} - f _ {n _ k} \right\rVert _ p \leq 2^{-m} \end{aligned}

by the choice of f _ {n _ k}. So f _ {n _ k} \rightarrow f in \mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu). Also, f = (f - f _ {n _ k}) + f _ {n _ k} \in \mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu).

Let \epsilon > 0 be given. Since \left( f _ n \right) is a Cauchy sequence in \mathcal{L}^{p}, \exists\,N \in \mathbb{N} such that for all n, m \geq N, \left\lVert f _ n - f _ m \right\rVert < \frac{\epsilon}{2}. Note that n _ k \geq k, so n _ k \geq N if k \geq N. Choose N _ 1 \geq N such that for k \geq N, \left\lVert f - f _ {n _ k} \right\rVert _ p < \frac{\epsilon}{2}. Then for all k \geq N _ 1,

\left\lVert f - f _ k \right\rVert _ p \leq \left\lVert f - f _ {n _ k} \right\rVert _ p + \left\lVert f _ {n _ k} - f _ k \right\rVert _ p < \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon.

참고. \mathcal{L}^{p} is a complete normed vector space, also known as Banach space.

정리. C[a, b] is a dense subset of \mathcal{L}^{p}[a, b]. That is, for every f \in \mathcal{L}^{p}[a, b] and \epsilon > 0, \exists\,g \in C[a, b] such that \left\lVert f - g \right\rVert _ p < \epsilon.

증명. Let A be a closed subset in [a, b], and consider a distance function

d(x, A) = \inf _ {y\in A} \left\lvert x - y \right\rvert , \quad x \in [a, b].

Since d(x, A) \leq \left\lvert x - z \right\rvert \leq \left\lvert x - y \right\rvert + \left\lvert y - z \right\rvert for all z \in A, taking infimum over z \in A gives d(x, A) \leq \left\lvert x - y \right\rvert + d(y, A). So

\left\lvert d(x, A) - d(y, A) \right\rvert \leq \left\lvert x - y \right\rvert ,

and d(x, A) is continuous. If d(x, A) = 0, \exists\,x _ n \in A such that \left\lvert x _ n - x \right\rvert \rightarrow d(x, A) = 0. Since A is closed, x \in A. We know that x \in A \iff d(x, A) = 0.

Let

g _ n(x) = \frac{1}{1 + n d(x, A)}.

g _ n is continuous, g _ n(x) = 1 if and only if x \in A. Also for all x \in [a, b] \setminus A, g _ n(x) \rightarrow 0 as n \rightarrow\infty. By Lebesgue’s dominated convergence theorem,

\begin{aligned} \left\lVert g _ n - \chi _ A \right\rVert _ p^p & = \int _ A \left\lvert g _ n - \chi _ A \right\rvert ^p \,d{x} + \int _ {[a, b]\setminus A} \left\lvert g _ n - \chi _ A \right\rvert ^p \,d{x} \\ & = 0 + \int _ {[a, b]\setminus A} \left\lvert g _ n \right\rvert ^p \,d{x} \rightarrow 0 \end{aligned}

since \left\lvert g _ n \right\rvert ^p \leq 1. We have shown that characteristic functions of closed sets can be approximated by continuous functions in \mathcal{L}^{p}[a, b].

For every A \in \mathfrak{M}(m), \exists\,F _ \text{closed} \subseteq A such that m(A \setminus F) < \epsilon. Since \chi _ A - \chi _ F = \chi _ {A \setminus F},

\begin{aligned} \int \left\lvert \chi _ A-\chi _ F \right\rvert ^p \,d{x} & = \int \left\lvert \chi _ {A\setminus F} \right\rvert ^p \,d{x} \\ & = \int _ {A\setminus F} \,d{x} = m(A \setminus F) < \epsilon. \end{aligned}

Therefore, for every A \in \mathfrak{M}, \exists\,g _ n \in C[a, b] such that \left\lVert g _ n - \chi _ A \right\rVert _ p \rightarrow 0 as n \rightarrow\infty. So characteristic functions of any measurable set can be approximated by continuous functions in \mathcal{L}^{p}[a, b].

Next, for any measurable simple function f = \sum _ {k=1}^{m}a _ k \chi _ {A _ k}, we can find g _ n^k \in C[a, b] so that

\left\lVert f - \sum _ {k=1}^{m} a _ k g _ n^k \right\rVert _ p = \left\lVert \sum _ {k=1}^{m}a _ k \left( \chi _ {A _ k} - g _ n^k \right) \right\rVert _ p \rightarrow 0.

Next for f \in \mathcal{L}^{p} and f \geq 0, there exist simple functions f _ n \geq 0 such that f _ n \nearrow f in \mathcal{L}^{p}. Finally, any f \in \mathcal{L}^{p} can be written as f = f^+ - f^-, which completes the proof.

이러한 확장을 몇 번 해보면 굉장히 routine합니다. \chi _ F for closed F \rightarrow \chi _ A for measurable A \rightarrow measurable simple f \rightarrow 0\leq f \in \mathcal{L}^{p} \rightarrow f \in \mathcal{L}^{p} 와 같은 순서로 확장합니다.